The Question is from neet-botany , and it was created by the author D VINOD

Question

Why is secondary growth absent in monocot stems?

D VINOD · Accepted Answer

## CORE INFORMATION
✓ **Answer**: B
## CONCEPT FRAMEWORK
 **Primary Concept**: Secondary growth in plants
 **Related Topics**: Monocot vs dicot anatomy, vascular cambium, interfascicular cambium, meristematic tissues
 **Prerequisites**: Understanding of plant tissue systems, growth processes in plants.
## SOLUTION PATHWAY
**Given Information**:
  The question asks why secondary growth is absent in monocot stems.
  Secondary growth refers to the increase in girth or diameter of a plant.
**Method & Steps**:
 1. Understand the role of cambium in secondary growth.
  Reasoning: Secondary growth is driven by the activity of the vascular cambium and the cork cambium (phellogen). The vascular cambium produces secondary xylem (wood) towards the inside and secondary phloem (bast) towards the outside, increasing stem diameter.  The cork cambium produces the periderm (bark).
  Formula/Rule:  None directly applicable, but understanding the role of the cambium is crucial.
 2. Analyze the vascular arrangement in monocot stems.
  Working: Monocot stems have scattered vascular bundles, unlike dicots which have vascular bundles arranged in a ring.  Crucially, monocots lack a continuous layer of vascular cambium between the vascular bundles (interfascicular cambium) and thus lack a continuous cambium ring.
  Key Point: The absence of a continuous cambium is the key factor preventing secondary growth.
 3. Conclude why secondary growth is absent.
  Result: The absence of a continuous cambium (both fascicular and interfascicular) in monocot stems prevents secondary growth.
  Verification:  The presence of scattered vascular bundles, while a characteristic of monocots, is not the direct cause of the absence of secondary growth. The absence of the cambium is the primary reason.  The presence of sclerenchyma and the lack of interfascicular cambium are both related to the absence of secondary growth, but the lack of interfascicular cambium is more directly responsible. 
 ## OPTION ANALYSIS
A :x: Presence of scattered vascular bundles is a characteristic of monocot stems, but it is not the direct cause of the absence of secondary growth.  The scattered arrangement prevents the formation of a continuous cambium ring.
B ✓: Absence of cambium is the correct answer. The lack of a continuous vascular cambium is the primary reason why monocots do not undergo significant secondary growth.
C :x: Presence of sclerenchyma is a feature of monocot stems, but it doesn't directly prevent secondary growth. Sclerenchyma cells provide support, but the absence of cambium is the key factor.
D :x: Lack of interfascicular cambium is a contributing factor, but it's more accurate to say that the absence of a continuous cambium (including both fascicular and interfascicular) is the overall reason for the absence of secondary growth. 
 ## LEARNING AIDS
 **Common Mistakes**:
  1.Confusing the scattered vascular bundles as the primary reason for the absence of secondary growth: Focus on the role of the cambium in secondary growth.
  2.Overlooking the importance of the continuous cambium ring: A complete ring of cambium is necessary for substantial secondary growth.
 **Quick Tips**:
  1.Remember that secondary growth requires a continuous vascular cambium.
  2.Associate monocot stem structure (scattered vascular bundles) with the absence of a continuous cambium.

D VINOD · Answer

Presence of scattered vascular bundles

D VINOD · Answer

The correct Option is "Absence of cambium"

D VINOD · Answer

Presence of sclerenchyma

D VINOD · Answer

Lack of interfascicular cambium

NEET Botany MCQs

Select Chapter

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

NEET Subjects

Our Bots

Company