The Question is from neet-botany , and it was created by the author K SURESH KUMAR

Question

Which of the following is *not* a limitation of classical taxonomy?

K SURESH KUMAR · Accepted Answer

## CORE INFORMATION
✓ **Answer**: D
## CONCEPT FRAMEWORK
 **Primary Concept**: Classical Taxonomy vs. Modern Taxonomy
 **Related Topics**: Phylogenetics, Systematics, Morphological characteristics, Molecular data, Homologous vs. Analogous traits, Convergent evolution
 **Prerequisites**: Understanding of basic taxonomic principles and the limitations of relying solely on morphological data.
## SOLUTION PATHWAY
**Given Information**:
The question asks to identify the statement that does *not* represent a limitation of classical taxonomy.

**Method & Steps**:
1. **Analyze each option:** Each option describes a potential limitation of classical taxonomy. We need to identify the option that is *not* a limitation.
	Reasoning: Classical taxonomy primarily relies on observable physical characteristics (morphology) to classify organisms.  This approach has several inherent limitations.
	Formula/Rule: N/A
2. **Evaluate option D:** Option D states that classical taxonomy incorporates molecular data. This is incorrect. Classical taxonomy predates widespread use of molecular data like DNA sequencing.  Molecular data is a cornerstone of modern phylogenetic analysis, not classical taxonomy.
	Working: Classical taxonomy uses primarily morphological characteristics; molecular data is a feature of cladistics and modern phylogenetic methods.
	Key Point:  The use of molecular data is a key difference between classical and modern taxonomy.
3. **Confirm the other options as limitations:** Options A, B, and C accurately reflect the limitations of classical taxonomy:
	A: Morphological similarities can arise through convergent evolution (different species developing similar traits independently), leading to misclassifications.
	B:  Morphological classifications don't always accurately reflect evolutionary relationships (phylogeny) because of convergent evolution and other factors.
	C: Distinguishing between homologous traits (shared ancestry) and analogous traits (similar function but different ancestry) can be challenging based on morphology alone.
	Result: Option D is the only statement that is *not* a limitation of classical taxonomy.
	Verification: The other options are well-established limitations of classical taxonomy.  Option D contradicts the fundamental nature of classical taxonomy.
## OPTION ANALYSIS
A :x:  This is a limitation.  Convergent evolution leads to similar morphologies in unrelated species.
B :x: This is a limitation.  Morphological similarity doesn't always reflect evolutionary history.
C :x: This is a limitation.  Determining homology vs. analogy is difficult using only morphology.
D ✓: This is *not* a limitation. Classical taxonomy did not use molecular data.
## LEARNING AIDS
 **Common Mistakes**:
  1.Confusing classical and modern taxonomy:  Understanding the historical context of each is crucial.
  2.Overlooking convergent evolution:  Convergent evolution is a major source of error in classical taxonomy.
 **Quick Tips**:
  1.Focus on the historical context of classical taxonomy – its reliance on observable traits.
  2.Remember that molecular data is a defining feature of *modern* phylogenetic analysis.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

It relies heavily on morphological characteristics, which can be subject to convergent evolution.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

It may not accurately reflect evolutionary relationships.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

It can be difficult to distinguish between homologous and analogous traits.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

The correct Option is "It incorporates molecular data for a more comprehensive analysis."

NEET Botany MCQs

Select Chapter

Question Tags

NEET Subjects

Our Bots

Company