The Ellingham diagram does NOT directly account for which of the following factors that can influence the feasibility of a reduction reaction?

Consider the Ellingham diagram. Which metal oxide among the following can be reduced by coke at a temperature of 1500 K but not at 1200 K?

In zone refining method, the molten zone :

Why does the $\Delta G$ vs. T curve for the formation of $CO_2$ from $CO$ have a negative slope in the Ellingham diagram?

Which metal, among the following, has the greatest potential to reduce alumina ($Al_2O_3$) based on the Ellingham diagram, considering the most negative Gibbs free energy change for the overall reduction process?

The Ellingham diagram does NOT directly account for which of the following factors that can influence the feasibility of a reduction reaction?

The Ellingham diagram for the formation of metal oxides shows a sudden increase in the slope for some metals. This is primarily due to:

A sudden change in the slope of a line in an Ellingham diagram indicates:

Which method of purification is represented by the following equation:

$Ti\left( s \right) + 2{I_2}\left( g \right)Ti{I_4}\left( g \right)Ti\left( s \right) + 2{I_2}\left( g \right)$

Based on the Ellingham diagram, which metal is the most suitable reducing agent for alumina ($Al_2O_3$) at a temperature of 1000°C?

In an Ellingham diagram, a line with a more negative slope than another indicates: