The Question is from neet-botany , and it was created by the author D VINOD

Question

A researcher is studying the biodiversity of a remote rainforest.  Which combination of taxonomical aids would be MOST effective for on-site species identification and documentation?

D VINOD · Accepted Answer

## CORE INFORMATION
✓ **Answer**: C
## CONCEPT FRAMEWORK
 **Primary Concept**: Taxonomic aids for species identification
 **Related Topics**: Biodiversity, field research, taxonomy, systematics
 **Prerequisites**: Understanding of different taxonomic aids (keys, manuals, herbaria, floras, monographs, catalogues, etc.)
## SOLUTION PATHWAY
**Given Information**:
  The researcher needs to identify and document species in a remote rainforest.
  On-site identification and documentation are required.
**Method & Steps**:
 1. Evaluate each option based on suitability for on-site use in a remote rainforest.
  Reasoning:  The options should be portable, readily usable in the field, and provide relevant information for species identification.
 2. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each option.
  Working:
  A. Monograph, Key, and Preserved specimens: Monographs are detailed studies of a specific taxon, often not practical for on-site rapid identification. Preserved specimens require a lab setting.
  B. Flora, Catalogue, and Zoological park access:  Catalogues and zoological park access are not useful for on-site identification.
  C. Manual, Key, and Herbarium sheets: Manuals provide general information, keys aid in species identification, and herbarium sheets (if available locally or pre-collected) provide visual comparison.
  D. Treatise, Monograph, and Botanical garden access: Similar to option A, treatises and monographs are too extensive for field use. Botanical gardens are not accessible in a remote rainforest.
 3. Select the option that best meets the on-site needs.
  Result: Option C (Manual, Key, and Herbarium sheets) is the most practical.  A manual provides background information, a key allows for identification based on observable characteristics, and herbarium sheets (if available) offer visual comparison.
  Verification:  The chosen option provides the necessary tools for efficient on-site species identification and documentation in a remote rainforest.
 ## OPTION ANALYSIS
A :x: Monographs are too detailed for field work. Preserved specimens are not practical for on-site use.
B :x: Catalogues and zoological parks are not accessible in a remote rainforest.
C ✓: Manuals provide general information, keys are essential for identification, and herbarium sheets (if available) aid visual comparison.
D :x: Treatises and monographs are too bulky for field use. Botanical gardens are not practical for a remote rainforest setting.
 ## LEARNING AIDS
 **Common Mistakes**:
  1.Choosing options with lab-based resources instead of field-based tools: Focusing on options requiring laboratory equipment or access to distant facilities.
  How to avoid: Carefully consider the context of the research setting (remote rainforest) and select options suitable for field use.
  2.Overlooking the importance of keys for species identification:  Failing to recognize the crucial role of dichotomous keys in identifying species based on their characteristics.
  How to avoid: Understand the function of dichotomous keys and their application in taxonomic studies.
 **Quick Tips**:
  1.Prioritize portable and readily usable taxonomic aids for field research.
  2.Remember that keys are fundamental for species identification in the field.

D VINOD · Answer

Monograph, Key, and Preserved specimens

D VINOD · Answer

Flora, Catalogue, and Zoological park access

D VINOD · Answer

The correct Option is "Manual, Key, and Herbarium sheets"

D VINOD · Answer

Treatise, Monograph, and Botanical garden access

NEET Botany MCQs

Select Chapter

Question Tags

NEET Subjects

Our Bots

Company