The Question is from neet-botany , and it was created by the author D VINOD

Question

A researcher is studying the biodiversity of a remote rainforest.  Which combination of taxonomical aids would be MOST effective for on-site species identification and documentation?

D VINOD · Accepted Answer

## CORE INFORMATION
✓ **Answer**: C
## CONCEPT FRAMEWORK
 **Primary Concept**: Taxonomic aids for species identification
 **Related Topics**: Biodiversity, field research, taxonomy, systematics
 **Prerequisites**: Understanding of different taxonomic aids (keys, manuals, herbaria, floras, monographs, catalogues, etc.)
## SOLUTION PATHWAY
**Given Information**:
  The researcher needs to identify and document species in a remote rainforest.
  On-site identification and documentation are required.
**Method & Steps**:
 1. Evaluate each option based on suitability for on-site use in a remote rainforest.
  Reasoning:  The options should be portable, readily usable in the field, and provide relevant information for species identification.
 2. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each option.
  Working:
  A. Monograph, Key, and Preserved specimens: Monographs are detailed studies of a specific taxon, often not practical for on-site rapid identification. Preserved specimens require a lab setting.
  B. Flora, Catalogue, and Zoological park access:  Catalogues and zoological park access are not useful for on-site identification.
  C. Manual, Key, and Herbarium sheets: Manuals provide general information, keys aid in species identification, and herbarium sheets (if available locally or pre-collected) provide visual comparison.
  D. Treatise, Monograph, and Botanical garden access: Similar to option A, treatises and monographs are too extensive for field use. Botanical gardens are not accessible in a remote rainforest.
 3. Select the option that best meets the on-site needs.
  Result: Option C (Manual, Key, and Herbarium sheets) is the most practical.  A manual provides background information, a key allows for identification based on observable characteristics, and herbarium sheets (if available) offer visual comparison.
  Verification:  The chosen option provides the necessary tools for efficient on-site species identification and documentation in a remote rainforest.
 ## OPTION ANALYSIS
A :x: Monographs are too detailed for field work. Preserved specimens are not practical for on-site use.
B :x: Catalogues and zoological parks are not accessible in a remote rainforest.
C ✓: Manuals provide general information, keys are essential for identification, and herbarium sheets (if available) aid visual comparison.
D :x: Treatises and monographs are too bulky for field use. Botanical gardens are not practical for a remote rainforest setting.
 ## LEARNING AIDS
 **Common Mistakes**:
  1.Choosing options with lab-based resources instead of field-based tools: Focusing on options requiring laboratory equipment or access to distant facilities.
  How to avoid: Carefully consider the context of the research setting (remote rainforest) and select options suitable for field use.
  2.Overlooking the importance of keys for species identification:  Failing to recognize the crucial role of dichotomous keys in identifying species based on their characteristics.
  How to avoid: Understand the function of dichotomous keys and their application in taxonomic studies.
 **Quick Tips**:
  1.Prioritize portable and readily usable taxonomic aids for field research.
  2.Remember that keys are fundamental for species identification in the field.

D VINOD · Answer

Monograph, Key, and Preserved specimens

D VINOD · Answer

Flora, Catalogue, and Zoological park access

D VINOD · Answer

The correct Option is "Manual, Key, and Herbarium sheets"

D VINOD · Answer

Treatise, Monograph, and Botanical garden access

NEET Botany MCQs

Select Chapter

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

NEET Subjects

Our Bots

Company