The Question is from neet-botany , and it was created by the author K SURESH KUMAR

Question

Which of the following is *not* a limitation of classical taxonomy?

K SURESH KUMAR · Accepted Answer

## CORE INFORMATION
✓ **Answer**: D
## CONCEPT FRAMEWORK
 **Primary Concept**: Classical Taxonomy vs. Modern Taxonomy
 **Related Topics**: Phylogenetics, Systematics, Morphological characteristics, Molecular data, Homologous vs. Analogous traits, Convergent evolution
 **Prerequisites**: Understanding of basic taxonomic principles and the limitations of relying solely on morphological data.
## SOLUTION PATHWAY
**Given Information**:
The question asks to identify the statement that does *not* represent a limitation of classical taxonomy.

**Method & Steps**:
1. **Analyze each option:** Each option describes a potential limitation of classical taxonomy. We need to identify the option that is *not* a limitation.
	Reasoning: Classical taxonomy primarily relies on observable physical characteristics (morphology) to classify organisms.  This approach has several inherent limitations.
	Formula/Rule: N/A
2. **Evaluate option D:** Option D states that classical taxonomy incorporates molecular data. This is incorrect. Classical taxonomy predates widespread use of molecular data like DNA sequencing.  Molecular data is a cornerstone of modern phylogenetic analysis, not classical taxonomy.
	Working: Classical taxonomy uses primarily morphological characteristics; molecular data is a feature of cladistics and modern phylogenetic methods.
	Key Point:  The use of molecular data is a key difference between classical and modern taxonomy.
3. **Confirm the other options as limitations:** Options A, B, and C accurately reflect the limitations of classical taxonomy:
	A: Morphological similarities can arise through convergent evolution (different species developing similar traits independently), leading to misclassifications.
	B:  Morphological classifications don't always accurately reflect evolutionary relationships (phylogeny) because of convergent evolution and other factors.
	C: Distinguishing between homologous traits (shared ancestry) and analogous traits (similar function but different ancestry) can be challenging based on morphology alone.
	Result: Option D is the only statement that is *not* a limitation of classical taxonomy.
	Verification: The other options are well-established limitations of classical taxonomy.  Option D contradicts the fundamental nature of classical taxonomy.
## OPTION ANALYSIS
A :x:  This is a limitation.  Convergent evolution leads to similar morphologies in unrelated species.
B :x: This is a limitation.  Morphological similarity doesn't always reflect evolutionary history.
C :x: This is a limitation.  Determining homology vs. analogy is difficult using only morphology.
D ✓: This is *not* a limitation. Classical taxonomy did not use molecular data.
## LEARNING AIDS
 **Common Mistakes**:
  1.Confusing classical and modern taxonomy:  Understanding the historical context of each is crucial.
  2.Overlooking convergent evolution:  Convergent evolution is a major source of error in classical taxonomy.
 **Quick Tips**:
  1.Focus on the historical context of classical taxonomy – its reliance on observable traits.
  2.Remember that molecular data is a defining feature of *modern* phylogenetic analysis.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

It relies heavily on morphological characteristics, which can be subject to convergent evolution.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

It may not accurately reflect evolutionary relationships.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

It can be difficult to distinguish between homologous and analogous traits.

K SURESH KUMAR · Answer

The correct Option is "It incorporates molecular data for a more comprehensive analysis."

NEET Botany MCQs

Select Chapter

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

Question Tags

NEET Subjects

Our Bots

Company